Operator.iovs KiloClaw
Both run managed OpenClaw, so the VPS and the Docker setup are gone either way. The difference is what you get for the money.
KiloClaw details from kilo.ai, current as of June 2026. Both are managed OpenClaw; pick the one that fits how you work.
A custom dashboard
Operator wraps OpenClaw in a dashboard we built ourselves, so connecting an app is a click and changing how the agent behaves is a form you fill in. KiloClaw runs the same OpenClaw through the Kilo CLI, gateway, and recipes, which expect you to work like a developer. You do not need to be one to run Operator.
A full week, not a day
Operator gives you a full week to connect your apps, set up a real workflow, and watch it run across a few days before you commit. KiloClaw's standard plan gives you one day.
The apps you already use
Connect Gmail, Slack, Notion, GitHub, your CRM, and far past a fixed list through guided OAuth. KiloClaw ships about thirty pre-built integrations. When the app you need sits outside that set, Operator can still reach it.
Security built in
Every agent runs isolated, and your config and API keys are encrypted with AES-256. We keep a hardening program that tracks OpenClaw as it changes, so the safe defaults stay safe without you configuring anything.
Operator vs KiloClaw, answered
Try Operator for a week
Sign in, connect your apps, and give your agent the first job, free for a full week.